Check out my video. It’s pretty funny and it shows us that we need to fix our elections. Share it!
The first paragraph of this article is here for a very specific reason. To promote the article on social media I had to make sure that there was no political speech in the first couple of lines so that it wouldn’t be censored. The original started here:
Democrats now control the White House and both chambers of Congress. They are calling for unity, but what they mean by that is, “Now everybody needs to agree with us.” That is not going to happen. I am not saying that in an obstinate way. I’m just being realistic and honest. People disagree and that is alright. Republicans were in charge for the last four years and many people disagreed with them, and I expected that as well because that is how life works.
This leads me to my one request to Democrats. Now that you’re in charge please give us the same courtesy that we gave to you when we were. That courtesy is this: When people disagree with you, don’t force them to do what you want.
This may surprise some of you after being told by the media for four years that President Trump was a fascist dictator, but I cannot think of anything that he forced us to do during his term. If you disagreed with President Trump and the Republicans, they did not make you do anything against your will. Republicans let people agree to disagree.
If, for example, you disagreed with the tax cuts that were passed, Republicans did not force you to go along with it. They implemented no penalties for people who wanted to keep paying the higher tax rates voluntarily. Yes, you can do that. Surprisingly, wealthy Democrats who complain that rich people don’t pay their fair share do not opt to pay more themselves when given that choice. Alright, maybe not so surprisingly.
Ultimately, this is the main thing that Republicans want: to be left alone. We want to control our own lives and let others control theirs. Another example; we may understand that homosexuality is immoral, but we do not block people from the practice. In fact, the Trump administration started a global effort to end the criminalization of homosexuality. (In contrast, Democrats kowtow to countries like Iran who put homosexuals to death.) Republicans also disagree with divisive groups like Antifa and Black Lives Matter, yet do not want them prevented from speaking or kicked off of social media. Another Republican belief is that God is central to the American way of life and necessary for our success, but we do not want to require church attendance. In other words, Republicans would like everybody to act in particular ways but think that people should be free to choose for themselves.
This approach is not a new one. It is actually one of the principles that our country was established on. Our Founding Fathers were wise men who understood that people would not always agree as to what should be done. They also knew that throughout history, when the powerful forced those who disagreed with them to conform to their will it sowed contempt, division and conflict. Their solution was liberty. If one group wants to do “A” and another group wants to do “B,” the answer is not to have the group in power force the other group to do what they command. Instead, the first group can do “A” and the second group can do “B.” They can try to use persuasion to win the other side over but they should not use coercion.
If Joe Biden really wants unity this is what he should do. Refrain from taking away our liberty. Allow people to have free will and do what they think is best for themselves. He can disagree with our choices but he should not overrule them. Here are ten great suggestions that the Democrats can do to respect the liberty of Americans:
- If you decide to raise taxes, make it optional to pay the old rate like the Republicans did for you.
- If you want people to wear masks, make it optional like the Republicans did.
- Let scared restaurant owners who want to shut down do so, and let the ones who want to remain open choose to do that. If patrons want to show up they can but if they are afraid they should also be free to stay home.
- Let churches decide whether to remain open or close down. If congregants do not want to attend they should not be forced to, but those who do should be allowed in.
- President Trump stopped enforcement of the Johnson Amendment, which threatens to take away tax-exempt status from churches if the pastor endorses a political candidate. Continue with that policy and allow pastors to decide for themselves what to say from the pulpit without threat of retaliation from the government.
- If somebody wants health insurance that covers pregnancy and drug rehabilitation they should be allowed to purchase it. If another person wants less expensive insurance that does not cover those things they should be allowed to choose that. If someone else prefers to pay out of pocket for medical care instead of buying insurance they should be able to do that.
- Do not force law abiding citizens to buy guns. Likewise, do not prohibit them from buying guns.
- If someone wants to do a job for $8 per hour, do not prohibit them from doing so and force them out of a job. Let people decide for themselves what wage to accept.
- Do not force people who are against murdering babies to pay for the murder of babies. Do not use taxpayer money for Planned Parenthood.
- Refrain from banning or restricting us from using certain products like incandescent light bulbs, straws, grocery bags, soda, and shower heads with good water pressure.
These are all things that Democrats have tried to dictate in the past. If they truly want unity this list would be a solid first step. Instead of using tyrannical power to control those of us who disagree with them, try going back to our founding vision of liberty. It’s the least they can do after Republicans did it for them the last four years.
As President Trump leaves the White House I have been contemplating his similarities with another great leader who challenged the status quo and “drained the swamp.” The biblical king, Josiah, was the last good king of Israel’s southern kingdom of Judah before they were defeated by the Babylonians and taken into captivity.
Both the United States and Judah had gone downhill quite a ways after some downright bad leaders who “did evil in the sight of the Lord.” Don’t get me wrong, both nations also had some good leaders, except that they failed to roll back all of the evil policies of the bad rulers. When reading through the books of Kings and Chronicles you begin to notice a pattern arise where the good kings usually had one fatal flaw mentioned. It seemed to always be described like it was here with King Jotham:
And he did what was right in the sight of the Lord; he did according to all that his father Uzziah had done. However the high places were not removed; the people still sacrificed and burned incense on the high places. – 2 Kings 15:34-35
These high places were generally set up in Israel by the bad kings and were used for pagan worship and idolatry. Even the few kings who “did what was right in the sight of the Lord” failed to remove the high places, with two exceptions: King Hezekiah and his great-grandson King Josiah.
It made me wonder why the other good kings allowed the high places even though it was obviously wrong. Then it struck me. It’s for the same reason that our good presidents have not reversed the immoral policies of our bad presidents. They knew that many people would not like it and they lacked the political courage to follow through. There was probably a lot of political pressure by the people who worshipped and sacrificed at the high places, and even the good kings bowed to that pressure.
Kings Hezekiah and Josiah did not. They both had the backbone to stand up for what was right and removed the high places from the land. In the United States, conservatives have been frustrated because even when we elect good leaders they have lacked the courage to do what is right. Like Hezekiah and Josiah, President Trump has not. Here are some of his landmark accomplishments:
- The first wicked king of Judah was Solomon’s son Reheboam. When he became king the people came to him and said, “Your father made our yoke heavy; now therefore, lighten the burdensome service of your father and his heavy yoke which he put on us, and we will serve you.” (1 Kings 12:4) In other words, regulations. The government was forcing them to do too much and interfering with their lives. Reheboam took the bad advice of his friends and responded, “My father made your yoke heavy, but I will add to your yoke; my father chastised you with whips, but I will chastise you with scourges!” (1 Kings 12:14) Our bad presidents have greatly increased the bone crushing regulatory burden on the people. Our good presidents, like George W. Bush and his father, said they were for smaller government but did not actually lessen regulations. President Trump did. He made a guideline that for every new regulation, two had to be removed. This led to a booming economy and record low unemployment.
- Both good and bad presidents have said that we should recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and move our embassy there. None of them had the guts to actually do it. President Trump did.
- Speaking of Israel, President Obama greatly damaged our relationship with God’s chosen people and our greatest ally. He treated Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with contempt. His administration chastised Israel for defending themselves. He backstabbed them and allowed them to be attacked in the United Nations. Most notably, he put Israel in grave danger by appeasing Iran and making a deal to remove sanctions against them and give them billions of dollars without even forcing them to end their nuclear program. President Trump was the most pro-Israel president of my lifetime and maybe ever. He defended Israel in the United Nations, acknowledged their sovereignty over the Golan Heights, and ended the appeasement of Iran by pulling out of the dangerous Iran Nuclear Deal. He was even able to broker peace deals between Israel and Bahrain, Sudan, and the United Arab Emirates.
- About ten years ago my health insurance started to rise precipitously in price. President Obama had forced through the government monstrosity now known as Obamacare, which also took away our freedom with regards to our healthcare decisions. President Trump eliminated the individual mandate, taking the teeth out of Obamacare and giving individuals back more control of their healthcare.
- After years of weak defense of our nation’s borders, President Trump was able to get over 400 miles of wall built.
- There is one rule that is repeated in each of the first five books of the Bible; that murderers should be put to death. The federal government has failed in this responsibility, as only 3 murderers had been executed between 1963 and 2020. President Trump has enforced the death penalty for murderers again, with 13 federal executions being carried out in the last year.
- Good presidents and candidates have been lied about and vilified by our biased and corrupt media for decades, frustrating millions of Americans because previous presidents just took the abuse. President Trump fought back and constantly called out the media for their unfairness and propaganda.
- One of the great reforms of King Josiah is found in 2 Kings 23:10. “And he defiled Topheth, which is in the Valley of the Son of Hinnom, that no man might make his son or daughter pass through the fire to Molech.” To make your child pass through the fire meant to sacrifice them to the Moabite god Molech. This evil practice was not only allowed to happen in Israel by the wicked kings, but kings Ahaz and Manasseh actually sacrificed their own sons. The United States has a similar practice that is protected by the wicked presidents: abortion. Unfortunately, even our good presidents have been inept at curtailing this evil act. President Trump has stepped up to the plate and defended babies. He was the first president to attend the March for Life. He has found a way to block funding for Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in the country. Most importantly, he has appointed three pro-life Supreme Court Justices.
You may be wondering why I chose Josiah to compare President Trump to instead of Hezekiah since they both stood up against the status quo and removed the high places, and I have two reasons. First, Hezekiah came earlier and that leads me to compare him to another great president who upset the apple cart, President Reagan. Second, Josiah was only 8 years old when he became king, and President Trump does tend to speak without much tact like a kid might. It is disappointing that too many people couldn’t get past that lack of tact, because like King Josiah, he may be the last great president we ever have. Thank you, President Trump, for making us great again.
Last week the Cleveland Indians decided to change their name. Since it was announced, the far left sports media has been heaping praise on the organization for being so forward thinking and proactive. My initial reaction was annoyance and disappointment, but then I thought, “I should really look at it from their perspective.” No, I don’t mean from the perspective of Indians, because as even Washington Post polling from just a few years ago shows, most Native Americans were not offended by the Washington Redskins football team name, much less the Indians. I mean from the perspective of a leftist.
Think about it. A great sports team name is tough, powerful, and formidable. There are Panthers, Giants, Vikings, Pirates, Diamondbacks, Braves, Titans, Lions and Tigers and Bears. Oh my! Some might say that the nickname for the team closest to me, the Angels, sounds pretty harmless, but as we know from A Charlie Brown Christmas, when an angel appeared to the shepherds to announce the birth of our Savior they were “sore afraid.” An angel is probably very intimidating. If you are not on the left you might think Indians are also tough, but remember, we are putting ourselves in the shoes of a leftist. The left doesn’t see Indians as powerful. They see them as whiny, overly sensitive, easily offended wussies. Who would want their home team represented as that? You might as well call them the Cleveland Flower Girls. It makes perfect sense that you would not want your team to have such a pathetic, weak name.
About now some of you are shocked. “I can’t believe he just said Indians are whiny, overly sensitive, easily offended wussies! That is racist!” Except I don’t think that. I think Indians is a great team name. I know that the team was actually nicknamed for Louis Sockalexis, the first Native American player in Major League Baseball. I think that Native Americans can be tough and formidable. It is the left that thinks Indians are fragile wimps that need protection from being seen as anything other than victims. Apparently even leftists who want to give out trophies to everybody are too competitive to name their team after people they consider helpless victims.
I must admit, when looking at this through the eyes of a leftist I caught myself a couple of times using logic instead. One of the first things that popped into my head was Abbott explaining to Costello that there’s only one Feller on the Cleveland Indians. It was very hard for me to put aside my assumption that Abbott and Costello were trying to do a hilarious bit about legendary Indians pitcher Bob Feller, and instead think that they were trying to make Native Americans cry. Then I thought about Willie Mays Hayes, Rick “Wild Thing” Vaughn, and Harry Doyle chiming “juuuuust a bit outside” in the classic baseball comedy about the Indians, Major League, and realized that a leftist cannot in good conscience watch that because the film caused irreparable damage to the lives of our indigenous population. Please don’t ask me what damage it caused because I’m new to thinking like a leftist and I have no idea. I think I’m supposed to avoid your question by calling you a racist for even asking it.
The name change actually does make logical sense if you think so little of Indians. People on the left will deny that this is what they are saying about Native Americans when they object to using the name Indians, but they can’t have it both ways. Don’t let them fool you. That is what they are saying. If they didn’t think indigenous people are overly sensitive wimps who would be offended by hearing a sportscaster say that the Indians beat the Tigers 8-3, then why the push to change the name? The only other option is that leftists are delusional enough to think that the sportscaster actually did mean to attack Indians by including the team in his report. If that is the case it seems like the least successful offense against Indians since the Little Bighorn.
“I think I’m going to be sick,” I said to my friend as we sat down to eat. It was the early 2000’s and I was part of the first generation of online daters. Back then there was no Tinder or Bumble. We used AOL and talked to girls through instant messages. I looked over at the girl behind the counter. Her name tag matched the girl to whom I had been talking. Her voice matched what I had heard on the phone, but it wasn’t the same girl. I had seen a picture of her. She was a thin brunette with large breasts and a seductive look on her face. The girl who had given us our food was about 5 feet tall and had to be over 200 pounds. I didn’t want to accept it, but I knew the truth. The girl had pretended to be somebody she was not. This phenomenon has become so common that there is even a word for it now – catfishing. I learned an important lesson that day. You have no idea that a person is who they claim to be until you verify it.
I once again have that sick feeling and this time it is far more important. President Trump finished election night with massive leads in almost all of the swing states. Unfortunately, many states allow votes to be counted that we have less verification of who they are coming from than I had with that girl. These mail-in ballots could have been sent in by anybody. In fact, I pick up the mail from the mailbox at my apartment, so I easily could have taken my roommate’s ballot, filled it out, and sent it in to be counted. I looked at the ballot. There is no verification process that would have prevented me from doing that. Most states have made catfishing the ballot box easier than catfishing a naïve, girl-crazed boy.
We have to fix our voting system so that we know who we are dealing with. I got better at it when it came to online dating, so we can use some of the same concepts. Generally, some sort of visual proof is necessary to figure out if a person is who they say they are. They didn’t have reverse web searches back then, and even now those do not always find the picture you’re looking for. Some guys would just assume that if a girl sent pictures that were too attractive she was fake, but that is not always the case, and you don’t want to miss out on a girl who really is the hot girl in the pictures. I’m looking at you, Minnesota Megan.
The first verification method I experimented with was to get multiple pictures instead of trusting just one. It has the benefit of preventing a girl (or maybe even a guy) from grabbing any old photo off the internet and saying it is them. It is an improvement, but you can find multiple pictures of the same girl all over the web, so it is also an easily beatable system. What you have to do is ask the person to send you real-time, spontaneously posed pictures. For example, you would tell the girl to send you a picture of her posing with her pinky to her mouth like Dr. Evil from the Austin Powers movies. Then tell her to send a picture of her balancing a book on her head. Generally, if she can send you those pictures immediately, she is really the girl photographed.
We can use that method to verify voters, but it poses many logistical problems. We need to trust the people doing the verification, so each voting precinct would have to have people supporting both candidates there for the verification process. It would be a tedious and lengthy undertaking, as every single mail-in voter would need to be contacted, one at a time, to confirm their identity matches the name on the ballot, pose for the random pictures and text or email them in, and confirm that the vote on the ballot is the correct vote that they sent in. As you can see, the randomly posed picture solution would be very difficult to pull off without it taking years.
Fortunately, I eventually figured out the one foolproof way to know that you are speaking to the person in the pictures. The only way to be sure is to physically meet the girl in person and match the picture to the actual human being. I know it’s a crazy concept, but I haven’t looked directly at a girl and been fooled into thinking she was someone else since Hayley Mills. How can we put this approach into practice in our elections? Easy. All we have to do is require people to vote in person on Election Day so that we can match them to the photo identification that they provide.
A very smart lawyer that I know basically told me that because Democrats made fraudulent votes nearly impossible to prove, those votes are legal and we shouldn’t say that they are fraudulent. Fine. Let’s just say that the Democrats are catfishing us. He also implied that the only thing we can do is try to get the Democrats who are in power to change the fraudulent system that got them into power in the first place. Good luck with that. I say we need to fight and fight now. If we don’t we may end up in a four-year relationship with Joe Biden, which would certainly be the end of our love affair with liberty.
This story starts a couple of years back when my mother started getting into family genealogy. She mapped out what we already knew, but then had a few family members spit into a tube to send to 23andMe and Ancestry.com to find out more information. We expected most of the interesting stuff to come from my mom’s side. How involved was the Italian part of our family in the mob way back when? Were we even Italian, or were we more Albanian as one of the tests showed? Was my aunt really the mailman’s daughter as they joked with my grandparents?
Interestingly enough, the most surprising thing we found out was on my dad’s side. The test came back and said that he is half Jewish. We had no idea that we had any Jewish in our DNA at all, much less 50%. If you know my dad, his reaction was exactly as you would expect. He took me to the Katella Deli and ate corned beef, latkes, matzah ball soup, babka, gefilte fish, knishes, challah bread, and blintzes. I love my dad.
Fast forward to Christmas, 2019. I wanted to get my dad something imaginative that he wouldn’t expect and would also give him a laugh. Then an idea hit me. I looked online for a “Make America Great Again” yarmulke. It was perfect! I found one on Etsy, a website where people can make crafty products and set up their own “shop” to sell their wares on. The gift was a hit.
Fast forward again, this time to August 27 of this year. In my email I find a message from the guy who I bought the yarmulke from. It began like this:
Dear Valued Customer,
Please forgive us for sending you this unexpected email, you are receiving this because you purchased a “Trump Make America Great” Kippah or Yarmulke from our Etsy store during the past two years. First, I want to thank you for the purchase, you should know that this store was a labor of love to help my kids pay for their Bar and Bat Mitzvah’s, my family is ever grateful to you for being part of that.
We really need you to know the recent sad events that have transpired at our Etsy shop, Etsy who sides in many leftist causes came under pressure from the social media mob and have succumbed and permanently suspended our shop where we sold these MAGA kippahs. It appears a customer showed off their wares on TicTok and got a tsunami of leftist outrage. We were used to getting nasty messages on Etsy but this time Etsy sided with this outrage mob and has shut us down.
My jaw dropped. It isn’t surprising that leftist bullies would go on the attack. Democrats do not tolerate disagreement. The astonishing part was that Etsy had let them get their way and actually closed down this man’s shop. I responded to the email and asked if I could speak to him about what happened and he agreed.
We spoke on the phone last week and he asked that I don’t use his name out of concern for his kids. He told me that his son is a supporter of the president and has been harassed at school and has even been called out on what was described as a “mean girls” kind of webpage meant to “cancel” people. For that reason I will call him Daniel in this article.
Daniel is an interesting man with some insightful perspective on how the left is using Marxist tactics to silence anybody who disagrees with them. You see, Daniel is a Russian Jew who fled here in 1979 at the age of 9. He has seen the left in action in the Soviet Union and is alarmed at the similarities he sees with the Democrats in the United States today. He fears that Democrat policies and tactics will lead to the communism that his family fled from in the Soviet Union. He sees how the left is promoting division and pitting everybody against each other by pushing a victim mentality on people; rich vs. poor, black vs. white, gay vs. straight, male vs. female. He sees the left trying to silence people for having different opinions.
Daniel mentioned another tactic that is being used here in the United States and compared it to something I had never heard of before and had to look into, Josef Stalin’s “Doctor’s Plot.” In it, Stalin falsely accused Jewish doctors of plotting to kill Soviet leaders. Jews were denounced as poisoners and Daniel’s grandmother, who was a doctor with many patients, was reduced to seeing just a handful of patients in secret. Daniel sees Democrats doing the same thing by spreading horrible propaganda against people and vilifying them for political purposes. Just look at the slander the left has perpetrated against the police in our country and you can see the obvious comparison.
I told Daniel that it mystifies me that some Jews in America could ever vote for Democrats after seeing the rising antisemitism in that party. Between Representative Ilhan Omar’s openly anti-Semitic comments, Democrat’s support of the Iran Nuclear Deal that freed up $150 billion for a country that shouts “Death to Israel,” Democrats walking out on a speech by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, President Obama turning his back on Israel in the United Nations, some Democrats supporting the “BDS” movement, and the Democratic Convention booing an amendment to their platform that mentioned God and supported recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, it seems unfathomable that any Jew could support Democrats. Daniel told me that many secular Jews have forgotten their roots. He said that “Democrats have been letting Jews down for 80 years.”
I asked Daniel what he thinks us as Americans can do. He said that we need to focus on bringing the culture back. He said, “The left has won the culture war.” When we have major commercial websites shutting down shops for selling items that show support for our president, I fear he is right. This is just the tip of the iceberg of what kind of censorship and persecution we can expect if Democrats win next week.
Daniel had sold over 7,000 Trump yarmulkes before his shop was shut down. Whenever he tried to contact Etsy they told him that his complaint would be sent up the ladder but he never got anywhere with them. I reached out to Etsy and have not received a response. I also looked on Etsy at what other yarmulkes are allowed to be sold and found many, including “Biden/Harris” and “Black Lives Matter” versions.
Daniel has moved his business over to Ebay, and although he does not want me to confirm his identity, if you would like to support him just search on Ebay for “Trump kippahs” and many of the results will be from his shop. Just pick your favorite design and it is likely coming from him.
There should be an area of agreement between all reasonable people in the United States. For our country to survive we must be able to trust the integrity of our elections. If elected officials are abusing their power like they are in places like California right now, we need to have the ability to vote those people out of office or else there is no check against tyranny. When dishonest politicians are able to steal elections, they will.
Both Democrats and Republicans say that they want honest and fair elections. Both parties have complained about the integrity of our recent and upcoming elections. Unfortunately, they have different ideas about what is taking away the trust in our elections. We heard a lot from Democrats about Russian interference in the 2016 election. In fact, they have spent much of the last 4 years investigating it over and over again. Many of you may wonder how they allege that the Russians changed the outcome in 2016. Did they somehow hack our voting systems and change the vote counts? Did they fly in Russians to swing states where they cast illegal votes? No. The alleged Russian interference is that they said mean things about Hillary Clinton on Facebook. While that may be frustrating to Hillary fans, it does not actually make it easier for anybody to cast fraudulent votes. Plus, how many of you would change your vote because some stranger said something mean on Facebook?
Republicans ask a different question about voting that we should all agree is important. Do we know who is casting the votes in our elections and that no shenanigans are happening with those votes? If we don’t it opens the door to voter fraud, stolen elections, and the end of our government of the people, by the people, and for the people. Do not fall for the media line that very few people get convicted of voter fraud so nobody does it. That’s like saying a Las Vegas club that doesn’t check ID’s has no underage people inside because no underage people got caught.
How can we be more confident about who is voting and that they are correctly counted? The only way to be sure is to require in person voting, on Election Day, with matching photo ID to verify that the person is who they say they are. It’s easy and it’s common sense. Unfortunately, not everybody wants to have honest elections.
Each state sets up their own election laws, so some are far more reliable than others. Some are unwisely pushing for mail-in voting, with nobody there to verify that the person who filled out the ballot is the actual person that the ballot belongs to, and with no guarantee that the ballot will be delivered or counted. In fact, there is already an investigation into military mail-in ballots that were apparently opened and thrown into the garbage in Pennsylvania. The only time a mail-in ballot should be accepted is for overseas military personnel. All 50 states now allow some form of mail-in voting, so nobody gets a perfect score on preventing voter fraud, but some states at least have a few precautions set up.
Unfortunately, other states not only lack rules to prevent election shenanigans, but they come up with ideas to make cheating so easy that the Houston Astros wish they had thought of it. “Ballot harvesting” is the shady practice of allowing a third party to collect ballots and deliver them to be counted. This has all of the negatives of mail-in voting with the added problem of having partisan people targeting which ballots to bring in. In California this practice caused congressional districts that had always voted one way to flip. In many of the cases the returns had one candidate ahead at the end of election night only to swing wildly to the other side the next day. Whenever the results from election night change like that it raises major red flags as to the integrity of those votes.
It’s pretty unbelievable, but some states do not even require you to show identification when you go to vote. That means we have no idea who is casting votes in those states. Here in California, if I walked into a polling place and said my name is Fred Johnson, then I’m Fred Johnson. Apparently in Pennsylvania their Secretary of State said that they would not even throw out a ballot if the signature doesn’t match.
What we need is a report card to know which states have safe enough elections to trust the outcome. Below you will find it, with a grade based on how many precautions are set up to make sure that each vote has been properly cast by the correct, legal voter.
|State||Voting Only on Election Day||Voting In Person Only||ID Required to Verify Who Is Voting||Ballot Harvesting and Other Notable Rules||Grade|
|Alabama||Yes||No, but an excuse is required||Yes||Absentee ballots require witnesses and must be received before the close of polling||A|
|Alaska||No||No||Yes, but non-photo ID accepted||A special needs voter can have a representative return a ballot||C|
|Arizona||No||No||Yes, but non-photo ID accepted||Family member, household member, or caregiver can return ballots||C|
|Arkansas||No||No, but an excuse is required||Yes||Ballot harvesting allowed, but limit two ballots per authorized agent||B|
|California||No||No, and everyone receives a mailed ballot||No||Ballot harvesting allowed||F|
|Colorado||No||No, all mail-in election||No||Ballot harvesting allowed||F|
|Connecticut||Yes||No, but an excuse is required||Yes, but non-photo ID accepted||Others can return votes for disabled voters, with restrictions||B|
|Delaware||Yes, but early voting passed for 2022||No||ID is requested, but voters can sign an affidavit to avoid showing ID||Unspecified if ballot harvesting is allowed||D|
|Florida||No||No||Yes||Others can return votes for disabled voters, with restrictions||C|
|Georgia||No||No||Yes||Others can return votes for disabled voters, with restrictions||C|
|Hawaii||No||No, all mail-in election||ID is requested, but voters can recite their date of birth and address instead||Unspecified if ballot harvesting is allowed||F|
|Idaho||No||No||ID is requested, but voters can sign an affidavit to avoid showing ID||Unspecified if ballot harvesting is allowed||F|
|Illinois||No||No||No||Ballot harvesting allowed||F|
|Indiana||No||No, but an excuse is required, and coronavirus is not a valid excuse||Yes||Mail ballots must be received before the close of polling||B|
|Iowa||No||No||Yes, or another voter can vouch for their identity||Ballot harvesting allowed||D|
|Kansas||No||No||Yes||Ballot harvesting allowed||D|
|Kentucky||Yes||No, but an excuse is required||Yes||Others can return votes for disabled voter, with restrictions||A|
|Louisiana||No||No, but an excuse is required, and coronavirus is not a valid excuse||ID is requested, but voters can sign an affidavit to avoid showing ID||Mail ballots require a witness signature and must be received before the close of polling||B|
|Maine||No||No||No||Ballot harvesting allowed, but limited to five at a time||F|
|Maryland||No||No||No||Ballot harvesting allowed||F|
|Massachusetts||No||No||No||Ballots may be delivered by a family member or from a healthcare facility||F|
|Michigan||No||No||ID is requested, but voters can sign an affidavit to avoid showing ID||Family member or certified election assistant can deliver ballots. Ballots must be received by 6 pm on Election Day||D|
|Minnesota||No||No||No||Designated agent can return up to three ballots||F|
|Mississippi||Yes||No, but an excuse is required||Yes||Unspecified if ballot harvesting is allowed. Mail ballots require witnesses and must be received before the close of polling||B|
|Missouri||Yes||No||Yes, but non-photo is accepted||Ballots can be returned by a family member or a team of election authorities and require witness signatures||B|
|Montana||No||No||Yes, but non-photo is accepted||Law limited who could return ballots and only six per person, but a judge has held up the law||D|
|Nebraska||No||No||No||Others can return up to two ballots except for campaign workers||D|
|Nevada||No||No, and everyone receives a mailed ballot||No||Ballots may be returned by a family member||F|
|New Hampshire||Yes||No, but an excuse is required||If ID is not presented, the voter signs a challenged voter affidavit and votes a regular ballot. After the election a mailing is sent and the voter must sign and return it; if it is not returned, the voter will be investigated for voter fraud.||Family members, nursing home staff, and residential care staff can return up to four ballots which must be received before the close of polling||B|
|New Jersey||No||No, and everyone receives a mailed ballot||No||An authorized messenger can return up to three ballots||F|
|New Mexico||No||No||No||A caregiver or immediate family member can return ballots||F|
|New York||No||No, but an excuse is required||No||Unspecified if ballot harvesting is allowed||F|
|North Carolina||No||No||No, although a voter ID law was passed by voters, it was blocked by an Obama appointed judge.||Ballots require witness signature and may be returned by a near relative or legal guardian||F|
|North Dakota||No||No||Yes||Others can deliver up to four ballots, cannot be a candidate or be compensated||C|
|Ohio||No||No||Yes, but non-photo is accepted||Ballots can be returned by a family member||D|
|Oklahoma||No||No||Yes, but non-photo is accepted||Copy of ID, notarized ballot, or two witness signatures required||C|
|Oregon||No||No, all mail-in election||No||Ballot harvesting allowed||F|
|Pennsylvania||No||No||No||If voter becomes too sick to vote a representative, deputy sheriff or constable can deliver an emergency absentee ballot||F|
|Rhode Island||No||No||Yes||Unspecified if ballot harvesting is allowed||D|
|South Carolina||Yes||No, but an excuse is required, and coronavirus is not a valid excuse||Yes||Ballots may be returned by others except candidates or paid campaign workers and require witness signatures||A|
|South Dakota||No||No||ID is requested, but voters can sign an affidavit to avoid showing ID||Photo ID required for a mail ballot. An authorized messenger may deliver ballots, but if more than one they must notify the person in charge of the election||D|
|Tennessee||No||No, and a judge ordered them to allow no-excuse absentee voting||Yes||Unspecified if ballot harvesting is allowed||D|
|Texas||No||No, but an excuse is required||Photo ID requested. Voters who do not possess an acceptable form of photo ID and cannot obtain one, may present a supporting form of ID and execute a Reasonable Impediment Declaration||Photo ID required for a mail ballot. A household member, relative or person lawfully assisting a voter who is disabled or cannot read the ballot may return the mail ballot||C|
|Utah||No||No, all mail-in election||No||Unspecified if ballot harvesting is allowed||F|
|Vermont||No||No, and everyone receives a mailed ballot||No||Unspecified if ballot harvesting is allowed||F|
|Virginia||No||No||Yes, but non-photo accepted||Witness signature required for mail ballots. A designated representative can return ballot for a voter who is incapacitated or hospitalized||C|
|Washington||No||No, all mail-in election||No||Unspecified if ballot harvesting is allowed||F|
|West Virginia||No||No, but an excuse is required||Yes, or be identified by a poll worker||Anyone can return up to two ballots||B|
|Wisconsin||No||No||Yes||Unspecified if ballot harvesting is allowed. Photo ID required for a mail ballot and witness signature required||C|
|Wyoming||No||No||No||Unspecified if ballot harvesting is allowed||F|
Have any of you ever wanted to be a political speechwriter? This year could be your chance! Our media is so biased that they are pushing a candidate who has trouble remembering where he is, much less stringing two sentences together, just because he is the Democrat. We have already seen him talking about kids rubbing his hairy legs, roaches, and kids jumping on his lap. He has told us that, “poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids.” He recently gave a speech that was completely unintelligible where he rambled about Covid taking 100 years. Just last Friday he actually read “end of quote” straight from the teleprompter during a speech. Joe Biden needs your help!
It’s actually easier than you think to help out Joe. It was sitting right under my nose the whole time. On my bookshelf there is still an old Mad Libs book from when I was a kid. You may remember them. They would ask you for random words and then you would fill those words into a story to make it your own zany version, just like Joe does with his speeches. To make our own Joe Biden speech, all we have to do is take a section from a recent speech, take out some words, have a friend pick some replacement words without looking, and fill in the blanks. Let’s try it with the section right before his rambling Covid quote, which starts at the 11:07 mark in this link. First, I will give you the template to write an extremely realistic Joe Biden speech of your own! Then, I will show you an example Joe Biden speech using the template.
First, ask your friends for corresponding words to the list below without looking ahead at the speech. Then fill in the blanks with the words they gave you. Then use it in your portfolio to apply for a job with the Biden campaign!
- VERB (PAST TENSE): ________________________________
- ADJECTIVE: _______________________________________
- ADJECTIVE: _______________________________________
- PLURAL NOUN: ____________________________________
- NOUN: ___________________________________________
- A PROFESSION: ____________________________________
- A PROFESSION: ____________________________________
- PLURAL NOUN: ____________________________________
- ADJECTIVE: _______________________________________
- NOUN: __________________________________________
- VERB: ___________________________________________
- A FAMOUS PERSON: _______________________________
- A PROFESSION: ___________________________________
- PLURAL NOUN: ___________________________________
- NOUN: __________________________________________
- A NUMBER: ______________________________________
- NOUN: __________________________________________
- NOUN: __________________________________________
Now read the speech with your words to fill in the blanks.
I’ve ____(1)____ with police in this country for many years. I know most cops are __(2)__, __(3)__ people. I know how they risk their ___(4)___ every time they put that shield on and go out the door. I’m confident I can bring the police to the ___(5)___ as well. I’d make sure every ___(6)___ and ___(7)___ had the support they needed from the federal government. But I wouldn’t be looking to use the United States military against our own ___(8)___. If I were president, my language would be less ___(9)___, I’d be looking to lower the ___(10)___ in this country, not raise it. I’d be looking to ___(11)___ the nation. But look, if ____(12)____ wants to ask the question, “Who will keep you safer as ___(13)___?” Let’s answer that question. First, some simple ___(14)___. When I was vice president, violent ___(15)___ fell _(16)_% in this country. We did it without ___(17)___ and ___(18)___.
Finally, as I promised, here is an example Joe Biden speech by speechwriters Uncle Mark and my friend Nikki.
I’ve farted with police in this country for many years. I know most cops are ugly, questionable people. I know how they risk their testicles every time they put that shield on and go out the door. I’m confident I can bring the police to the beer as well. I’d make sure every insurance agent and sex therapist had the support they needed from the federal government. But I wouldn’t be looking to use the United States military against our own baseball players. If I were president, my language would be less stupid, I’d be looking to lower the woman in this country, not raise it. I’d be looking to eat the nation. But look, if George Clooney wants to ask the question, “Who will keep you safer as mechanic?” Let’s answer that question. First, some simple puppies. When I was vice president, violent birds fell 69% in this country. We did it without pizza and speakers.
There you have it! Had I not told you how it was made you probably would have thought it was straight from the campaign trail of the best Democrat the party could come up with.
How did yours turn out? Leave it in the comment section and let us be inspired!
In my new book The God Bet, I talk a lot about recognizing false frames that the media sets up to trick and confuse people. There is even a bonus section at the end of the book with an index of false frames that the left and the media use to define issues in dishonest ways to attack Republicans. This week a friend posted a video that was going around social media that uses so many false frames in such a short video that it would be a great opportunity to help you filter them out and “unspin” issues that the left is trying to manipulate you with because they think you’re gullible. Let’s prove to them that we aren’t.
The video can be seen here and starts with a portion of the Republican Convention speech by Kimberly Guilfoyle on Monday night. The caption said that it was full of lies so I was interested to hear why she would lie when all the truth is already on our side. In it, they edit to show parts of the speech where she is being emphatic and raising her voice, as well as parts where she is legitimately criticizing what Democrats will do if they win in November. The lies were not in there.
Then the podcaster who made the video pops on the screen and I figured out where the lies begin. He starts with a supposed joke that her speech is in the style of North Korean propaganda and that her speechwriter was Mussolini. Then he gets to the false frames. He claims that “the modern GOP is predicated on divisiveness and hate and bigotry.” What does he use as his proof? He continues, “Trump’s campaign was launched on the promise of banning Muslims and banning Mexicans from this country.” A half-truth and a boldface lie. With regards to Muslims he never suggested ejecting law abiding Muslim citizens from the United States. He did propose a temporary travel ban on countries where a large percentage of the population supports terrorism or sharia law, not because of bigotry or hate, but for national defense purposes. With regards to our Mexican immigrants, he does not want to ban your neighbor who legally immigrated here. He does want to stop people who break our laws from crossing our borders. To say that that is a ban on Mexicans is like saying if Disneyland banned me from sneaking in without paying it was a ban on white people from the park.
Later in his diatribe he has some better jokes than late night comedians have told in years, but that isn’t hard. He says that “optimism does not compute for this party (Republicans),” and jokes that, “you’d have more luck going into Home Depot for lasagna than expecting uplift from the GOP.” He says that Republicans are fearmongering and “are only capable of governing by fear.” He wasn’t even intending to be funny, but honestly, how hilarious are his claims? Republicans are divisive, pessimistic, and govern by fear? Let’s compare and see which party is more divisive, pessimistic, and fearmongering?
Poor people are victims of the evil rich. Gay people are the victims of intolerant Christians. Women are the victims of sexist men. Immigrants are victims of xenophobic white people. Black people are the victims of racist white people. The police are bigots who go to work each day trying to murder black people. You should vote for us to protect you from all these divisive, fearmongering monsters. Also, if you don’t vote for us you’re going to die from coronavirus if the world doesn’t end from global warming first.
America is a land of opportunity! If you work hard you can succeed no matter where you started. We are one nation, under God, and everyone should be free to worship as they please and live by those values. America is a great melting pot and immigrants are welcomed as equals on the day they take the oath of citizenship. Skin color is irrelevant. Black people are just as capable as white people. The police are heroes who try to keep law abiding citizens safe. If you vote for us we want you to enjoy your freedom and not have to worry about the government getting in your way.
Which party seems more divisive? Which one wants to scare you into voting for them?
But wait. It got better. After making the Bizzaro World claim that Republicans are the divisive ones, he defends the Democrats by denying reality. He says:
“What was par for the course was the fearmongering about Democrats; the threats about open borders and closed schools and sending jobs back to China and installing socialism and the police sending your calls to voicemail and controlling what you do and say… the thing is, none of that is true.”
The real thing is, he’s lying. That stuff is true. He claims that, “Zero Democrats are running on open borders.” They may not call it open borders but they fought against funding the wall and against any kind of real enforcement. Many of them have even voiced support for sanctuary policies and for abolishing ICE. Most Democrats do want schools closed and he even admits it later in the video. Democrats do want to put in place socialist policies and some, like Bernie Sanders, even call themselves socialists. This guy apparently hasn’t heard all of the talk about defunding police. I promise you that’s not coming from Republicans. As for controlling what you do and say, how can he deny it? Don’t Democrats want to control what you do with more of your money by taking it for the government? Don’t Democrats want to control where you can eat or whether you can go to a concert, sporting event, movie or church? Don’t Democrats want to control who bakers have to bake wedding cakes for? We could go on and on.
He says Republicans should run on real policy but then if we point out what Democrats actually stand for he calls it lies, straw man arguments, and fearmongering. Besides that, President Trump is running on policy. The Republican Convention this week was full of his policy accomplishments, because they are many. On the other hand, the only policy talk from Joe Biden at last week’s convention was that he would make the next four years smile free and faceless by requiring masks. Apparently that doesn’t count as controlling what you do.
This video is a great example of how the media tries to deceive you and it is not unusual. I watched President Trump’s inspirational, accomplishment filled acceptance speech Thursday night and then flipped around the news channels to hear what they were saying. The entire mainstream media really is like the Bizzaro World, where everything is opposite of reality. They told me his optimistic speech about American greatness, faith in God, and freedom was really about anger and divisiveness. It was perplexing, but I expected it. I always understand that the mainstream media is trying to manipulate us. You should too.
This is my first article in a few weeks because as you might know, I’ve been busy working on getting my new book, The God Bet, released. The premise of the book is that I will bet anybody a million dollars on which party God would vote for. It is getting good reviews, but so far I have been unable to add it to my “shop” page on Facebook. They rejected it and you won’t believe why. Here is the reason that they sent me:
“It looks like we didn’t approve your item because we don’t allow the sale of adult items or services (ex: sexual enhancement items, adult videos).”
Now, here is a link to the book. https://www.amazon.com/dp/1735532916
As you can see, there are no sexual enhancement items or adult videos related to the book cover. As most of you probably know, the cover is taken from Michelangelo’s famous painting The Creation of Adam, which is on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. It depicts God reaching down to give life to Adam, but on my book cover God is reaching out to cast a vote on stone tablets for the party He would support. There is a butt in the painting but it is entirely artistic and non-sexual. In fact, when I looked at the community standards that Facebook has posted it shows a bunch of examples of sexually suggestive pictures that are unacceptable, and then a picture that they say is artistic so it is acceptable. The acceptable example; a picture of Michelangelo’s nude sculpture of David.
The other thing that kept me busy this week was a trip to Las Vegas to visit some friends. It was very interesting to see how the casinos and the people inside were reacting to a disease that is only slightly more likely to kill you than a sharknado. The good news is that nobody was afraid of the coronavirus. People were mingling with each other, dancing together at the bar with a live band, high fiving, gambling, and drinking together. There was only one fear going around Vegas and I agree that we need to fight to end it. The real disease to fear is government licensure. You see, the way that the government controls businesses and takes away freedom is by issuing licenses to conduct business and then threatening to take those licenses away if they don’t do exactly what the government wants. This is why so few restaurants and bars are able to stand up to the government and open without restrictions. If they do, many states threaten to take away their liquor licenses, and most of their profits come from liquor sales. Proponents say that licensing is to protect the consumer, but in reality the free market already does that. If there really was a disease worth being afraid of and you opened your business, people would voluntarily stay away. Think about it. If there was a business that said they were open to people with ebola, would you need the government to take away a license to keep people away? No. And I doubt there was ever a very long waiting list to vacation at a leper colony.
The funny thing is, the people who actually push for licensing are the people who are already in those lines of work. As the brilliant economist Milton Friedman said, “If the real true function of licensing was to protect the consumers, you’d expect the consumers to be lobbying for licensure, but you will discover that it’s always the plumbers or the beauticians or the morticians… there isn’t an occupation you can name that hasn’t been down to the Statehouse trying to get licensure.” Why would businesses want licensing? Because it is a barrier to entry, so it keeps out competition. Less competition lets those who are already in control stay in control. The people who are hurt by licensure are competitors wanting to enter an industry and the consumers. In Las Vegas, the consumers are hurt right now because the casinos are afraid of losing their gaming licenses, so they are forced to require a bunch of silly rules. The one I thought was funny was that to walk through the hotels and casinos they required that you wear a mask, but if you were smoking you could keep the mask down. In a related story, I now smoke three packs a day.
The other big thing that happened this week was the Democratic Convention. I must admit, I didn’t watch it. I already knew what they were going to say. Trump is bad. Then the media would fawn over each speaker. I do have 2 observations, though. First, the media narrative that Republicans are turning on the president because John Kasich spoke is ridiculous. John Kasich spoke because he has a fragile ego and President Trump hurt his feelings 4 years ago when he beat him in the primaries. All his speech shows is that his hurt feelings are more important to him than his principles. He claims to be pro-life, but if he’s supporting Joe Biden he is not. He claims to be a fiscal conservative, but if he supports Joe Biden he is not. He has completely lost any respect from conservatives. If he had any backbone he would handle it differently. Ted Cruz, for example, has proven that he actually cares more about doing what is right than his ego. President Trump ripped on Senator Cruz relentlessly during the primaries 4 years ago. I’m sure his feelings were hurt by some of the brutal personal attacks, but Senator Cruz cares more about America than holding personal grudges, and has put the campaign behind him and become a strong ally of the president in conservative policies. I have gained a lot of respect and confidence in Cruz. John Kasich should toughen up and stop crying about sour grapes from 2016.
The second observation is that the Democrats actually did it. They nominated a guy that they admitted was corrupt just months ago. It wasn’t even the Republicans who were accusing Biden of being corrupt. It was his own party, the same Democrats who just picked him to top their ticket. You may not remember it because that isn’t how they framed it in the media. They framed it this way. “President Trump should be impeached because he tried to gain an advantage over his future political opponent, Joe Biden, by asking Ukraine to investigate him.” Think about what that’s saying. If Joe Biden didn’t do anything wrong, how would it be an advantage to President Trump to clear him? It wouldn’t. The only way it would be an advantage is if an investigation would uncover corruption. Democrats can’t have it both ways. Either they are saying that they impeached the president for trying to clear their candidate of wrongdoing, which doesn’t make sense, or they’re saying that their candidate is corrupt. Yet they chose him as their best. Remember that when you vote.