California is fighting back. No. Not against crime. Not against sky-high gas prices. Not against overregulation. My home state is fighting back to keep obstinate, disruptive kids in classrooms with your kids.
In a Los Angeles Times article by Daniel Miller, he explains that President Trump signed an executive order on April 23 that directed the Education Department to “root out school discipline frameworks based on discriminatory equity ideology and issue new commonsense practices in the nation’s K-12 schools.” In other words, President Trump does not think school discipline should be a matter of skin color. The state of California worries that this will lead to legal challenges, because their school discipline policies were changed in 2019 based entirely on woke, racial ideologies. They passed a law that year that banned suspending students who were “willfully defiant.”
Willful defiance is not an accident. It is, by definition, a purposeful act. Imagine a teacher who sees a kid with his cellphone out during class and tells him to put it away. In the past, kids would say, “Yes, Ma’am,” and put it away, knowing they had been caught. If they instead kept tapping at their phone and told the teacher to “F Off,” that would be willful defiance. Until 2019, schools could respond to such bad behavior by suspending the kid from school. After 2019, that student could not be suspended.
Why would California want to protect a willfully defiant student like that? The answer should not surprise you. California is woke, and based its decision on twisted, misused, and incomplete statistics on race and suspensions. Miller writes that “President Obama had directed schools to avoid enacting discipline policies that disproportionately punished underrepresented student groups – a stance later supported by President Biden.”
The state of California is allowing willfully defiant students to disrupt your child from learning because they say that black students are more likely to be suspended for willful defiance than white students, once again falsely implying that racism is rampant in our country. Here is the problem. California bases its claim that black students are disproportionately punished on twisted statistics. Miller’s article says that “Black students accounted for 17% of total suspensions in California – despite making up less than 6% of the student population.” That does not mean that black students are disproportionately punished. The article does not give you the relevant information to know that. The implication is that since only 6% of the students are black and 17% of the suspensions are black, those students are overrepresented by 11%. The problem is, the 6% number is entirely irrelevant, and the one statistic that is important is not even mentioned. The statistic that you actually need to know is the percentage of willfully defiant students who are black. That number is likely right around 17%.
To make it easy to understand, say there are 10,000 students in your school district. If 6% of the students are black and 94% are white, that means 600 students are black and 9,400 are white. Then, say that 100 of the students are willfully defiant; 17 blacks and 83 whites. According to the logic of Obama, Biden, and California, if you do not suspend 94 whites and 6 blacks, that would be disproportionate and racist. That would mean you have to let 11 of the willfully defiant black students get away with it, and worse, you would have to suspend 11 innocent white students. While this solution makes perfect sense to Democrats, they realize it would be hard to explain to the public, and especially to the parents of those 11 innocent white students. That led them to an alternative solution; to stop suspending any of the willfully defiant students. Now, the 9,900 other students have to sit in class with willfully defiant brats disrupting them, both black and white.
As you can see, the relevant number in that scenario is not the percentage of the 10,000 students who are black. It is the percentage of the 100 willfully defiant students who are black that is important. The article does not tell us that number.
The divisive left does the same thing when talking about people in prison for murder. They often claim that there is a disproportionate number of blacks in prison for murder than whites because more than 50% of the people in prison for murder are black, and only about 12% of the U.S. population is black. The 12% statistic is, of course, irrelevant. They fail to mention the one relevant fact, that more than 50% of murders are committed by blacks. That means that the number of blacks in prison for murder is proportionate to the number of murders they commit. Hopefully, their solution is not the same as it is with willfully defiant students; to stop putting any murderers in prison.
The list of reasons you should never let your child attend a public school is as long as Santa’s naughty and nice lists put together. The fact that they have to deal with willfully defiant students in class can now be added.


